Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:33

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Et distinctio voluptatem magni repudiandae.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Is It Finally a Buyer’s Market in Housing? - A Wealth of Common Sense
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
How should you brush your hair when its wet or dry?
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Is there any concrete proof that LED face masks actually work?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Brain’s Reward Center Tracks Not Just What, But When Rewards Arrive - Neuroscience News
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Anxious-depressed individuals underestimate themselves even when they’re right - PsyPost
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.